Things on Strings Review - Cascading Flowcharts of Cooperative Deduction!

Description provided by BoardGameCo on YouTube:

Check out our channel sponsor AllPlay for great games, tables, shelves and more! - https://www.allplay.com/ -------------------------------------------- BoardGameCo Ko-Fi (Exclusive Content) - https://ko-fi.com/boardgameco BoardGameCo Patreon (Exclusive Content) - https://www.patreon.com/boardgameco Instagram - https://bit.ly/39GvjNH -------------------------------------------- Channels I Recommend (Not a comprehensive list by any means) Professor Meg - https://www.instagram.com/professormeg/ EZBoardGames - https://www.youtube.com/@ezbgames The Board Game Garden - https://www.youtube.com/@TheBoardGameGarden Room & Board - https://www.youtube.com/@RoomandBoardReviews Thinker Themer - https://www.youtube.com/@ThinkerThemer -------------------------------------------- Campaign Link - https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/boardgametables/river-valley-jewelcraft You'll cooperatively use logic to compare, contrast, and categorize Things—just like in the first game (Things in Rings). But, instead of a Venn Diagram, the player playing as the Knower comes up with the rules of a cascading flowchart. As more and more Things get added, groups split with new rules. While the flowchart grows, you'll surprise yourself with how well you can follow the logic (or, laugh at yourselves at how lost you truly are). BGG Link - https://boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/468113/things-on-strings TimeStamps: 0:00:00 - Introduction 0:08:45 - Review 0:11:10 - Final Thoughts 0:12:40 - Recommendations 5.0 - My absolutely favorite games, I will rarely if ever turn down an opportunity to play these games. 4.5 - Oh my gosh, the absolute best games...but also I'm not always down to play them. For one reason or another these are just shy of perfect. Whether it's mechanics, length, brain burn whatever. 4.0 - This is where a game becomes recommended. Now I may or may not be in the mood, or even own it, especially considering other games. But a 4 is where we cross from good to great.3.5 - Really enjoyed, don't love it, will often lose out to better games, but there's a part of me that wants to own it/play it more. 3.0 - A good game, I enjoy playing it. But also if I never play it again I'm not losing any sleep over that. 2.5 - Wasn't the biggest fan. Wasn't the worst, but didn't feel like the best use of time. Would prefer not to play again but am willing to given the right circumstances. 2.0 - A game I don't want to play again. I'm not saying it isn't good, I'm saying I don't want to play it again regardless of circumstance. 1.5 - I did not like this game, do not want to play it, and think it's a fairly flawed game. 1.0 - I can't imagine rating a game this poorly ever. It would take something so abysmal I probably didn't get to even play it. Shelves & Table in this Video by AllPlay - https://www.allplay.com/ For media inquiries, please email alex@boardgameco.com For Gamefound inquiries, please email me at a.radcliffe@gamefound.com